Any touching of a child’s or teen’s genitals for the needs or sexual pleasure of an adult or older child is sexual abuse, and while it may not cause immediate physical harm to the child, it is abusive. Andy Burrows, the NSPCC’s head of policy for child safety online, sees its impact differently. He says the site blurs the lines between influencer culture and sexualised behaviour on social media for young people, and presents a “toxic cocktail of risks”.
Newsletters
The UK sets online safety priorities, urging Ofcom to act fast on child protection, child sexual abuse material, and safety-by-design rules. Find out why we use the term ‘child sexual abuse’ instead of ‘child pornography’. If you find what you believe to be sexual images of children on the internet, report this immediately to authorities by contacting Cybertipline.
Perhaps the most important part of the Ashcroft decision for emerging issues around AI-generated child sexual abuse material was part of the statute that the Supreme Court did not strike down. That provision of the law prohibited “more common and lower tech means of creating virtual (child sexual abuse material), known as computer morphing,” which involves taking pictures of real minors and morphing them into sexually explicit depictions. Learning that someone you know has been viewing child sexual abuse material (child pornography) must have been very shocking, and it’s normal to feel angry, disgusted, scared, or confused – or all of these things at once. Even though this person is not putting their hands on a child, this is child sexual abuse and yes, it should be reported.
Justice
- Learn how you can support us in our mission to eliminate child sexual abuse images and videos online.
- “Others described their occupation as accountant, architect, clerk, general manager, quality technician and self-employed,” the report said.
- A picture of a naked child may be considered illegal CSAM if it is sexually suggestive enough.
- Tlhako urged parents to monitor their children’s phone usage, and the social media platforms they are using.
Legally and morally, it is always the adult’s responsibility to set boundaries with children and to stop the activity, regardless of permission given by a child or even a child’s request to play a sexual game. Children cannot be responsible to determine what is abusive or inappropriate. Many adults who are struggling with concerning sexual thoughts and feelings towards children can and have gone on to live lives that are both fulfilling and safe.
Aaron was 17 when he started making videos on the site with his girlfriend in Nevada, US. The site requires applicants to pose next to an ID card and then submit a photograph holding it up to their face. But the age verification system failed to distinguish between them at any stage of the process, despite the age gap. But BBC News tested the site’s “new exceptionally effective” system in April.
What we know is that child sexual abuse material (also called child pornography) is illegal in the United States including in California. Child sexual abuse material covers a wide berth of images and videos that may or may not show a child being abused – take, for example, nude images of youth that they took of themselves. Although most of the time clothed images of children is not considered child sexual abuse material, this page from Justice.gov clarifies that the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. So it’s possible that context, pose or potentially even use of an image can have an impact on the legality of the way an image is perceived. While the Supreme Court has ruled that computer-generated images based on real children are illegal, the Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition decision complicates efforts to criminalize fully AI-generated content.
She told Sky News it is “easy and straightforward” now to produce AI-generated child sexual abuse images and then advertise and share them online. All ‘self-generated’ child sexual abuse imagery is horrific, and our analysts sadly see it every day, but seeing so many very young children in these images and videos is particularly distressing. The images seen can range from a display of genitals to a child penetrating themselves or another child and all for the gratification of an unknown predator. The government is requesting accountability from the platform akin to what the United States has done. They faced lawsuits, accusations, and questions from senators about child porn their efforts to prevent online sexual exploitation of children.